Whenever we talk about transition defence and how teams defend zone entries, the conversation inevitably turns to gap control.
Most readers know what gap control is, but just so we’re all on the same page: as the offensive player races up ice in an attempt to gain the offensive blue line, the space between them and the nearest defender is generally referred to as the defender’s “gap” and how well the defender manages this space is often referred to as their “gap control.” A defender with a small amount of space between themselves and the offensive player is said to have a tight gap. The prevailing wisdom suggests that the tighter the gap, the more pressure applied to the puck carrier, but the greater risk of allowing the offensive player to skate past the defender.
How can we measure that risk/reward scenario? It’s a question we haven’t been able to answer as we do not have player location data available. That’s where data companies likecome in.
This season, ICEBERG has graciously given me access to 75 games of data including their player and puck tracking technology in addition to event data we’re familiar with now (entries, exits, passes, shots, etc.). I’ll be researching the data and sharing findings here and elsewhere online. The findings shared here will be geared towards actionable insights for coaches and your teams. Today it’s gap control!
- Why coaches should seek a balanced lineup instead of ‘loading up’ the top line
- Dictating Shot Quality & Defensive Zone Coverage on the Powerplay
- Forecheck Data Analysis
We are sorry this post was not useful for you...
Tell us how we can improve this post?