The problem with point shots, according to analytics

duncan-keith-point-shot

Greg Revak

Greg Revak is a Certified Level 4 USA Hockey Coach. You can find him on Twitter @CoachRevak. or sign up for his Hockey IQ Newsletter.

View all posts
Get to the house instead.
4
(1)

I’m going to make what may seem like a bold statement, but really shouldn’t be: “point shots suck.”

When I first posted this on my newsletter, I got a ton of responses from all across the spectrum. Some people thought I was crazy, others agreed, and everything in between. Even my mentor disagreed at first before coming around. I want to echo that newsletter post and expand on it further as point shots are terrible on many fronts. Stick with me here.

Low shooting percentage

The first reason why point shots suck is that they don’t result in goals very often. From 2007-2017 Micah Blake McCurdy found that the shooting percentage from outside the house has been under 5%. His website HockeyViz has great content beyond just this. He is a former math professor who decided to work on hockey analytics in the public sphere (he has turned down multiple NHL teams).

Combining that with other data such as Clear Sight Analytics has come to show that point shots with traffic score around 3% of the time and without traffic score about 1% of the time. That is basically “playing catch” with the goalie.

It’s clear that point shots aren’t great options for scoring goals. However, some argue that they create rebounds for forwards to whack home for a goal, tips, screens, etc.

Creating rebounds

One of the largest errors in judgment is thinking that point shots create rebounds. Often, they don’t.

This chart from Alex Novet is great for several reasons:

  1. It shows that point shots actually create fewer rebounds than anywhere else.
  2. Understanding the opponent actually recovers a majority (about 60%) of the rebounds. Any time a shot is taken there is less than a 50% chance of getting the puck back.
  3. More rebounds are created from shots lower in the zone. A shot from the corner shot is preferred over a shot from the point.

You can find Alex’s full CBJHAC rebound presentation here.

Where rebounds actually come from

During the 2017-18 NHL season, Hiroki’s Analytics did a bunch of studies on goal scoring. One of their focus areas was rebounds. Not surprisingly and backing up what we just learned, point shots don’t often create rebounds. Shots from the house create rebounds with more frequency.

Get to the house instead . . .

MEMBER EXCLUSIVE CONTENT

ACCESS WITH YOUR 10 DAY FREE TRIAL NOW

Already a member? Login

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 4 / 5. Vote count: 1

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Since you found this post useful...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry this post was not useful for you...

Tell us how we can improve this post?

1 comment

  • “As a reminder, these are NHL players shooting these shots. Youth hockey would have worse odds of creating offence from point shots.”

    This is the only statement in this article that I would debate. Creating offence is not just dependent on the skill of the shooter. It is an equation involving the shooter, the defensive ability of the opponent and the ability of the goaltender. In youth hockey even though the shooters have less skill the gap between offence and defense is much wider than in pro hockey, which is why non transferable habits (such as mindlessly blasting the puck from the point) are formed.